Pipe used in sewer and culvert applications are categorized as either “rigid” such as clay or concrete
or “flexible” such as plastic, glass reinforced polymer, or corrugated steel. The common definition for a flexible pipe is: a pipe that can deflect 2% or more without cracking. While new types of flexible pipe products are continually being introduced, one critical aspect of flexible pipe design has not changed; minimize ring deflection to ensure good, long-term performance of the pipe.
Concrete pipe is available in different strengths where the pipe walls are designed to resist a specified
load. In contrast, flexible pipe is much more installation sensitive because the pipe itself has very little
load-carrying capacity and as a result needs to transmit the loads to both its bedding support and the
soil at the sides of the pipe. Flexible pipe is available in different stiffnesses which indicate the pipe’s
ability to resist deflection, however it’s the pipe-soil interaction that is the major structural component
of flexible pipe design. As the load on a flexible pipe increases, it becomes oval with the vertical
diameter of the pipe decreasing and the horizontal diameter increasing. This decrease in vertical
diameter is termed as the deflection, which is always expressed as a percentage.
Checking ring deflection in flexible pipe used for a sewer application is already mandatory in the Ontario
Provincial Standards (OPS). OPSS 410, the construction specification for Pipe Sewer Installation in Open
Cut, states that “ring deflection testing shall be performed on all pipe sewers constructed using plastic
pipe”. This clause highlights the fact that ring deflection is a critical component of flexible pipe
performance and is an important measure for assessing the quality of the installation. While most of the
deflection of a flexible pipe occurs in the first few months after backfilling, it could continue to increase
for several years, especially for plastic pipe under sustained loading, or fluctuating groundwater levels.
This is the reason for OPSS 410 also specifying that the initial deflection test must be performed “not
sooner than 30 Days after the completion of backfilling and installation of service connections”.
The shape of a flexible pipe goes through several changes before it even reaches its final installation
condition. The initial shape of a flexible pipe is rarely a perfect circle, especially for thermoplastic pipe
that is left out in the hot sun, or is secured for transportation over long distances. In some cases, a pipe’s
own weight will cause the pipe to sag which requires temporary internal struts to keep the pipe as
round as possible during installation. Also, the actual inside diameter of a flexible pipe may not be what
the design engineer assumes. For example, a 600mm diameter nominal pipe size, has a “base inside
diameter” listed in CSA B182.11, Standard Practice For The Installation Of Thermoplastic Drain, Storm,
And Sewer Pipe And Fittings, as 579.11mm for SDR 35 PVC and 581.67mm for corrugated HDPE. This is
already more than a 3% discrepancy below the nominal pipe size.
A proper flexible pipe design must specify the allowable deflection, and specify the soil embedment
necessary to ensure the pipe will not deflect more than its allowable limit. This is done by specifying a
trench width that is appropriate for the native soil condition, using the proper granular backfill materials
and compaction effort, and using the highest quality flexible pipe products available. This latter point
can be difficult because the long-term performance history of many flexible pipe products is limited.
Excessive deflection will not only affect the pipe’s hydraulic performance such as decreased flow
velocity, sediment build-up, corrugation growth, and other factors that contribute to hydrogen sulfide
corrosion; but it may lead to harmful strain levels in the pipe wall that can trigger structural failure
modes such as cracking, inverse curvature, and wall buckling. Excessive deflection can also compromise
the pipe joint performance which can lead to exfiltration or infiltration, and the loss of backfill material
Engineers must be aware that the allowable deflection limit is different for the various flexible pipe
materials. Applying a standard allowable deflection such as 5% will provide a factor of safety that
ranges from more than 4 for some flexible pipe installations, to less than 1 (likely failure) for others
depending on the stability and load-carrying capability of the soil around the pipe.
Most design engineers rely on design tables to determine if a pipe material is structurally adequate for
their project such as the Height of Fill tables available in the Ontario Provincial Standards. The danger
with this, especially for installation-sensitive pipe, is that many assumptions have been made by the
creators of these design tables. Designers must keep in mind that these design tables do not replace
good engineering and site condition assessments that might make their installation unique. In fact, one
of the leading manufacturers of plastic pipe has this disclaimer right in the opening paragraph of every
design table that they provide: “The information in this document is designed to provide answers to
general cover height questions; the data provided is not intended to be used for project design. The
design procedure described in the Structures section (Section 2) of the Drainage Handbook provides
detailed information for analyzing most common installation conditions. This procedure should be
utilized for project specific designs.”
Municipalities must realize that CCTV inspections of pipelines are not adequate for checking deflection.
While CCTV inspections are useful for visually checking a pipeline, it does not provide quantitative data
such as ring deflection measurements. Additionally, pipe materials that have black interiors make it
difficult to perform even routine CCTV visual inspections, which is why municipalities like the Region of
Peel in Ontario requires only plastic pipe with light coloured interiors.
For the ring deflection test, OPSS 410 requires a suitably designed mandrel, cylindrical in shape, and
constructed with an odd number (minimum of 9) of evenly spaced arms or prongs. The minimum
diameter of the circle scribed around the outside of the mandrel arms is equal to the allowable
deflected pipe diameter ± 1 mm. As the mandrel is pulled through a pipeline, any section that does not
allow the mandrel to pass is considered to have failed the deflection test. The mandrel pull is the most
common field test for checking ring deflection, however because it is only a go/no-go test new
technology like laser profiling is gaining popularity as an accurate method of measuring deflection which
is also becoming less cost-prohibitive.
Mandrel test starting at a Maintenance Hole
Typical mandrel with 9 arms
A laser profiler is a tool that can be mounted to a CCTV camera, a laser ring is projected onto the
internal surface of the pipe and the recorded video image is then processed by computer software to
produce a continuous, 3D model of the pipeline. This information can be easily analyzed for deflection
issues and becomes an invaluable tool for asset management departments to determine if a pipe is
changing by comparing laser profile reports over time.
Inverse curvature outlined by laser profiler (Image: Courtesy of Maverick Inspection Ltd.)
The University of Texas at Arlington recently completed a study of 176 plastic pipe culverts through 9
different US States. The report found an alarmingly high number of these culverts suffering from
excessive deformation and signs of structural failure. Although site conditions, climate, and
construction specifications can widely vary, the poor results from one border state, Michigan, should
be a warning sign to Ontario on how significant this issue is.
To access the full report from University of Texas, follow the link:
Steel reinforced polyethylene (SRPE) pipe is the latest product that has entered the already overcrowded ...
Every engineer should be keenly aware of the following relationship: RISK = Probability of Failure ...